on Killerbee We have a problem with non-integrated foreigners who live in societies and against accepting no laws. Everyone has heard of the Miri in Bremen, Omeirat, the Al-Zein heard any
know that no-go areas in almost every German city and everyone knows that the state failed in every aspect. Judge sentences speak Kuschel, police can "do anything unfortunately, forgotten prosecutors ever arrest warrants, journalists have the ominous" southerners "invented. And the politicians? We have seen Schroeder, as he visited the people in flood on the Elbe. We have seen politicians each party of attacks on asylum homes. We have seen the murder-Marwa. But what politician-no matter which party, whether government or opposition, as was once at a national whose only
Child was tapped because it did not reduce in time the look and the last before his death, "Wasgucksdu!" one has? One might almost think the politicians have a hatred or loathing of their own
people whose taxes they raise their taxes to use for parachutes and the money feeds them!
There are now several options for how people deal with the non wegzudiskutierenden
first It blames "the foreigners".
second It blames the Germans and the lack of integration efforts.
third It blames the failing state and its organs.
4th It blames the islam.
The first option is the "racist". Of course, it leads to the goal, because the
associated with foreigners crime would suddenly gone, when the
people were no longer there, they perpetrated. The problem is that we generally
against "foreigners" or "the Muslims" is going on, regardless of their actual deeds
.
appears Nevertheless, many people, unfortunately, this first option as
attractive because there are clear limits: on the one hand, "the Germans"
on the other side, "the Turks". "We" against "'The" simple and clear
it gets! But what about the judges whose judgments Kuschel have only led to
"offenders"? What about the policemen who were "unfortunately
do anything? What about the politicians who have never cared about a victim
on whose instructions the prosecutors acted only
had had because of those fake journalists the statistics? We have fought
the symptoms, the traitors and perpetrators but which would be
still in positions of power and would harm Germany
just different. "The foreigners" would suffer as scapegoats for German
betrayed their own people.
theoretically at least. Very practical one can assume that in the case
a "civil war" [we say internal war - Cairo] by marauding
vigilante
militia were from the state rendered harmless, because when Turks were randomly "expelled" by the Germans, would be the prelude to a real war that would end with the complete destruction of Germany. Who Germany should stand by for a possible war against Turkey?
England? USA? France? Austria? NO ONE! Germany would simply sacrificed.
The second option is the reasoning of the "good guy". It is
very convenient, because the Germans are used to being guilty and it costs
basically no effort. Whether we spend now some
billion useless for any brochures and reinforce the "fight against
law," given the perceived 0.1%
Nazis in Germany and one hundred billion dollar rescue screen for Ireland
really irrelevant. Therefore, the second Option, the path that the policy is
. It is connected with the least effort and take the German people
it down with a shrug ("Oh, because we are therefore also
fault?"). The problem with the 2 Option: It is of course completely
ineffective. You will enjoy a classic scheme, namely the duality
of "basic" and "justification". If you fight the real reason can not or will
, we invent a more or less plausible justification and
fighting mock battles then to act not idle. For this reason, it would be strange for
not me when Claudia Roth and Merkel would be well
friends. Merkel can not or will not tackle the real problems
would not alienate their core supporters with the argument-gooders
. Fortunately, however, will always point to Claudia Roth,
the imaginary on the German racism rumreitet and more money in the "war against
law" calls, so that Merkel yes no other choice ....
"good cop / bad cop" in its purest form!
The third option is the one that requires the most courage and is effective on
. She is also the one that is most unusual for the Germans on
. If a judge Müller offenders 100th
times can run, we need to put pressure on the judge. If policeman
Schulze at a death threat, "unfortunately, can not do anything," then we must put pressure on
policeman Schulze. Westerwelle If Turkey wants to have in the
EU, the DIW at least 500,000 immigrants would have a year and teachers
Meier is not applicable where my daughter is hunted down as "Christians bitch"
of Turks across the school yard, then we must challenge them directly
people / institutions. Why they have done something or not
have done is irrelevant. A betrayal of hundreds of thousands of victims
is not so bad in that he has been out of "loyalty to the service
Men" made. Precisely because of such men as the service
current officials swear namely, "to serve the German people" and just
NOT "every command faithfully execute." The reasons run "I've
but only following orders" we know all too well and she is then
been just as wrong as it is today. It is the argument of the amoral opportunists
. Everyone knows of course that the falsification of statistics
, the omission of nationalities, the looking away from the city known drug
terminals or the 100th Suspended sentence for
a homicidal killer is wrong. But his conscience is washed clean
by pointing out that one yet loyal and obedient towards the service of Sir
! Obedience must serve again as a substitute for missing
morality.
precisely for such situations like the present, there is Article 20 Paragraph 4 of the
Basic Law, which allows us to resist anyone who wants to abolish the rule of law-
therefore exactly what is happening now
. Too bad that the judges, the application of Article 20, paragraph 4 of the Constitution would approve
be eliminated first by the system! Article 20.4
I see only as a hint of the Constitution makers, in doubt listen to his conscience to
. Only a fool would expect that a state bodies in the fight
help against the authorities, therefore the excuse "I would, but I may
not" also hollow, because if the corruption is on top the
is official "may" never occur. Or is someone a revolution
known which began when the government told the people: "You Dared
disempower us now"
The fourth option, the emerging "criticism of Islam", is apparently a good thing
. It shows the basis of the Koran, that Islam calls for violence and terror
. What could be more than "Islam" to ban? It is yet
even to "the root of evil" because if there are no more fonts that
call to violence, there are no more power! Or is it?
Of course the fourth option completely ineffective and, in contrast to the 2
option also completely unenforceable because it violates the religious freedom
, the Islamic infiltrated by the United Nations has recently been presented as the fundamental right
-par when it comes to Islam,
course. "To recognize religious status"
The response of the "Islamic critics" in this situation, the distinction
between a verbietbaren "political Islam" and an incident-free
"religious Islamic" or even on Islam
is just ridiculous and only makes the helplessness clear which they are sometimes aware
.
The worst thing about the "criticism of Islam" is that it is totally inappropriate
to deal with current problems.
Let's go back to Ali offenders in Bochum. Even the most convinced add
critics of Islam have that Ali can recite any two suras and if
he was asked why he kept German beaten up and they steal the mobile phone
, you often get a surprisingly honest answer: "Because the
Germans are victims and not defend themselves ! All loner! "
could with the current failing state institutions and defenseless German
disappear overnight all Korans in the world, minarets collapse, and the Kaaba
disappear, crime in Germany
would not even begin to fall. Because the criminals do not
are criminal, because the Koran tells them, but from a much simpler
reason: BECAUSE YOU THERE MAY
criticism of Islam is basically just a variation of the second option, instead of completely
sinnfrei combat the alleged causal racism among Germans to eliminate the problems with
certain aliens, you fight the Islamic
alleged causal. On the question of how and where to fight because "Islam"
, there is no answer. The "criticism of Islam" does not go to the
root, but is shadow boxing with a different opponent.
So if the third option, the fight against the failing organs of the State
is the most effective, why it falls to us so very difficult?
Because the other 3 options compared to infinitely are easy!
It is easy to fight "against Islam" against law '"or, for
ideologies do not fight back. It is also easy to "foreigners out" as German
to fight "the Turks" and roar. But (permitting the prosecution of children) against the
failing German school director,
against the German police (who indeed taxpayers' money as a salary gets
but when it gets tough "did not do anything") may, against the
German judge ( creates, by its conduct offenders) are against the German mayor
(forged on the order statistics
) proceed It takes courage. It is the struggle against their own
failure, against the "self" against German harming their people
-over may only misguided loyalty to their service men
, that of "obedience".
The third option, the struggle of a people against their government is, by the way
better known by another name: REVOLUTION
Let us hope that it runs peacefully, but it will come. This for
the East. We do not like to to be after 20 years in prison already
again betrayed by a ruthless regime and sold! *
0 comments:
Post a Comment