Average Breast Sizes By Countries
generalizations
racism from our society almost left verbs Deten defined as follows: the racist writes an ethnic group characteristics. Lump. That bastard!
bgesehen fact that you are so deprived of such speech and thought control of an analytical method (you may not see groups as groups, so one can predict no group behavior), it's all these bans all about "denigrate." the other group did not No one has any objection to it is said that Jews and Asians would have a high average IQ only the claim that however much it may be Hedged with sources, Arabs or Africans would have a lower average IQ, meets with resistance. Here are struggling, hurt, is excited and the speaker condemned as racist. The above-mentioned highly intelligent members of such a contested ethnic group unearthed behind the stove and stand as evidence that the general verdict must be wrong. You can leave impossible 60% of the Turks out of school when this one Turk who sits at Maybritt Illner, mathematics studied.
Imagine the reverse situation: only, not to have to be considered more intelligent than the rest of us led the Asians living in Germany before the dumbest members of their people. "There are also Vietnamese stupid! No generalizations please! "
is corrosive it right when describing a condition, such as the hostility of the Germans. If one now finds that the front line is here to actually look at the ethnic boundary, one is a racist. Non-German enemy aliens, but the one which has been described as the German hostility.
To to understand this madness, you have some basic assumptions that have internalized the modern Western societies, and their consequences, call back into memory. Manfred's Who "Dschihadsystem" at hand, which read, "p. 18f. under the heading of "xenophobia" again after. Who has not, here gets a little incentive to buy:
"No doubt it is stupid and primitive, something strange
solely classified as hostile or even inferior to stamp, because it is foreign. (...) The downside of the ban on xenophobia namely, the acceptance of hostility against their own country (not just in Germany, but in virtually all Western countries). (...) Obviously, is a self-critical attitude not only of individuals but also of the collective, as a virtue, while the rejection of foreign collectives can be regarded as reprehensible. (...) The solidarity of this varied group - especially in conflict with foreign groups - [was] always been a central social norm. Central, because a society in which they would not been necessary had not been assessed as able to survive. "(Manfred Kleine-Hartlage.. The Dschihadsystem p. 19f)
ie in Plain text follows:
I can not make sweeping statement about others, but this definitely about me and my people.
The Germans were allowed to collectively as racially inferior, the authoritarian nature of poisons as dumb as a submissive like cattle and still filled with racism and hatred describe.
No problem!
No one will show a German, of all this is not. It would namely fear that comes out that is actually not a German - but beware, this is a sweeping statement!
people who talk about sweeping statements like in the sense as those who warn us against mono-causal explanations. Here, too, agrees in principle, yes, there is always more than one cause of a situation. But the friend of the "Polykausalität" moved us also the view of the primary cause or just want to appease only (this is not Islam, are the cultural characteristics, "etc.).
Why is this so important and we do not know all that long ago?
I mention that here again to make clear that we Germans each day of a structural difference in treatment are exposed to being brazen, also still maintains that there is structural racism, which went out from us, that is a Schlechterbehandluhng of "minorities."
We can not defend qua argument, however, since we were just harmless to the moral club makes.
Add the links to be open. The "moderate" say they would not discuss with "Nazis" who want less moderate shoot us all, because they are against violence, as these slackers here.
Only when we retrieved it, this self-evident: Germany is our country (and not "also" the country), we are not a group of assholes (or as Sammy Deluxe once said "a few million ass faces with Ner face full Hämhorriden "), and we can calmly say" Turks are bad "or" Arabs are aggressive "or" the Chinese are training intent "- without always stressed that we were not generalize wanted and to the many, many counterexamples know.
The prohibition of generalizations is not a heroic victory against the seizure law, but a prohibition on thinking that we should take away an important analytical ability: the ability to evaluating groups, their characteristics, their behavior. It also should prevent us to come at the end also point out that these properties and the behavior of the groups of their ethnic origin, say, is partly determined by genetics. I stress, determined, single-cause explanations are far from me!
latest since you Sarrazin set before every talk show is 100% integrated Muslims with an IQ of 360, I'm sorry for the saying that one should just not make generalizations. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment