Ulla Schmidt and the Hartz IV recipients
"... I am the opinion that if we our ALG II - recipients look closely at your fingers, then a federal minister may exempt their actions and should not necessarily undergo also a moral test. So that they would return the policy 'loss of credibility at least to some extent ... "
If the state, the Hartz IV - ausgespioniert recipients with former Stasi employees, IM's and Stasi methods (see Magdeburg, Offenbach district ..) then he should treat with the same methods of tax evasion. If it really just about the loss and go to overpaid money, so money that is missing from the state in one way or another, we ought to be go there, find out the most is to get.
The actions against Hartz IV recipients should be in their total costs - are represented, including the public expense by 85% lost processes carried HARTZ IV recipients hard.
There are from 90,000 procedures. Assuming that 50% lose these processes of state and added that the lost processes in the past and to the staff costs of the total of the Hartz IV process involved public servants who
I would like to expect the results of the audit process to see .
Hartz IV total costs out of control costs
Hartz IV with total control 25.6 billion (without Processes)
balance
Realistic tax BRD Total 100 000 000 000
staff and personnel to recover this money which actually
excessive funds?
it comes to money or to make the platform of people?
0 comments:
Post a Comment