And Chancellor Merkel spoke of the suffering of the displaced! And on that day!
Monday, August 31, 2009
Getting Pregnant After A Hysteroscopy
70 years Poland Westerplatte 4:45
And Chancellor Merkel spoke of the suffering of the displaced! And on that day!
And Chancellor Merkel spoke of the suffering of the displaced! And on that day!
Wrestlers With Trechcoat
Anne Will - Maybrit Illner
deleted from the SZ:
walker evans: Anne Will - Maybrit Illner
since 2003 I do not watch television, and such shows, thank God even more.
sleep well, save nervous - like me it is the reading here can sometimes be felt again.
But the public broadcasting: DLF, DRadio, WDR5 etc. can have a really exciting - even there it is - except, perhaps, Sandra Schulz / DLF - only right Journalists! Corrosive ...
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/513/485933/text/8/?page=1 read comment # 
deleted from the SZ:
walker evans: Anne Will - Maybrit Illner
since 2003 I do not watch television, and such shows, thank God even more.
sleep well, save nervous - like me it is the reading here can sometimes be felt again.
But the public broadcasting: DLF, DRadio, WDR5 etc. can have a really exciting - even there it is - except, perhaps, Sandra Schulz / DLF - only right Journalists! Corrosive ...
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/513/485933/text/8/?page=1 read comment #
Sunday, August 23, 2009
How Much Money In Pokemon Monopoly
bullying by "verbal gaffes"?
Discussion of the decision by Attorney Dr. jur. Frank Sievert, London: review of the decision of the District Labour Court Cologne document number 7 SA 857/08
's to be discussed ruling by the state labor court of Cologne deals with the question of the definition of bullying by verbal gaffes and socially adequate "rough manners" apart. For the first time made clear that bullying can also be caused by verbal gaffes. Relevant for the assessment of verbal attacks or comments are typical of social and workplace standards. For the question of which expression or as "normal Behavior "or a provider of general workplace conflict is a distinction based on the workplace conditions and the typical social structure of the parties make in the workplace. Example, this had run the country's labor court in Nuremberg's decision 6 Sa 537/04. There were comments like: "The applicant drive like a pig, the applicant had no knowledge of his job, he, the defendant will see to it that is given the applicant has no more leg to the ground." In the room. Explicitly stated the trial court that such remarks at a truck driving are significant criticism, which constitutes a crude criticism no formal insult. The verdict was
following facts:
The plaintiff, a 55-year-old baker who was not treated as severely disabled, worked in a bakery. During his tenure, the applicant was in the years 2006 and 2007 several requests because of too low performance in a loud tone, to pursue his work performance. This by the plaintiff as a "yell" perceived instructions of his superiors appreciated the applicant as bullying and demanded damages of € 20,000.00. The trial court dismissed the application having regard to the customary practice of social practice / statement of the supervisors, which preclude the adoption, by the yell the manager was bullying. Moreover, the court denied an intent to cause damage of the superior.
I. Reasons
The trial court makes clear in the grounds to see the conditions under which a collection of "verbal gaffes" as bullying can be. Conduct of third parties which are perceived as harassment by an employee, must therefore be differentiated from the still as a "workplace conflict general" tone to be regarded in the company. Here, after the conviction of the trial court decisively to focus on the type of operation and workers in the circle of normal social etiquette. In companies with high background noise, the instructions can be in a much louder tone of voice than in an office. Generally, the Court noted that it trades in any case "be a little firmer," so that the perceived as offensive by outsiders under circumstances where manners count to normal handling of the colleagues and superiors with each other. This is particularly so if the reason is the loud exchange of words in an objective criticism of the service rendered. Whenever because of the volume of used machinery and the merits of fair criticism of the finished work performance of an employee of either the rough or loud tone of voice will be considered in the first whether the new tone in the specific context or "socially adequate" was. Only if either the terms used or the tone as such in a particular case were no longer acceptable, there is room for an examination of the "intent to cause damage" of the offender and thus for bullying acts and suffering.
II consequences for the employee prevails
After that decision right now for reasons of security workers. That court has held in its decision clear limits of pain and suffering claim. The reality of life following the trial court has called for a serious violation of individual rights to to reach a damages claim. Whether an injury is serious it produces depends on whether the meaning and scope of the intervention, cause and motive and the degree of fault on the socially excessive, BAG NZA 2007, page 1154, BGHZ 160, page 298 The trial court emphasized that it "depended workplace conflicts general" for the award of damages to a definition of "bullying" and. Only when there is a long-term and systematic injury, you may be conscious and purposeful verbal hostility, a corresponding right to financial compensation exist, BAG NZA, page 781, BAG NZA 2007, page 11545.
The practical consequence of this decision is hard to miss. Workers who feel bullied because of improper or inappropriate tone along with vociferous criticism reproving only prospect of financial compensation if the statements made in this particular case have left the normal social framework.
Dr. jur. Frank Sievert participate
lawyer
Hamburg, 17.08.2009
www.kuendigungsschutz-aktuell.de 
Discussion of the decision by Attorney Dr. jur. Frank Sievert, London: review of the decision of the District Labour Court Cologne document number 7 SA 857/08
's to be discussed ruling by the state labor court of Cologne deals with the question of the definition of bullying by verbal gaffes and socially adequate "rough manners" apart. For the first time made clear that bullying can also be caused by verbal gaffes. Relevant for the assessment of verbal attacks or comments are typical of social and workplace standards. For the question of which expression or as "normal Behavior "or a provider of general workplace conflict is a distinction based on the workplace conditions and the typical social structure of the parties make in the workplace. Example, this had run the country's labor court in Nuremberg's decision 6 Sa 537/04. There were comments like: "The applicant drive like a pig, the applicant had no knowledge of his job, he, the defendant will see to it that is given the applicant has no more leg to the ground." In the room. Explicitly stated the trial court that such remarks at a truck driving are significant criticism, which constitutes a crude criticism no formal insult. The verdict was
following facts:
The plaintiff, a 55-year-old baker who was not treated as severely disabled, worked in a bakery. During his tenure, the applicant was in the years 2006 and 2007 several requests because of too low performance in a loud tone, to pursue his work performance. This by the plaintiff as a "yell" perceived instructions of his superiors appreciated the applicant as bullying and demanded damages of € 20,000.00. The trial court dismissed the application having regard to the customary practice of social practice / statement of the supervisors, which preclude the adoption, by the yell the manager was bullying. Moreover, the court denied an intent to cause damage of the superior.
I. Reasons
The trial court makes clear in the grounds to see the conditions under which a collection of "verbal gaffes" as bullying can be. Conduct of third parties which are perceived as harassment by an employee, must therefore be differentiated from the still as a "workplace conflict general" tone to be regarded in the company. Here, after the conviction of the trial court decisively to focus on the type of operation and workers in the circle of normal social etiquette. In companies with high background noise, the instructions can be in a much louder tone of voice than in an office. Generally, the Court noted that it trades in any case "be a little firmer," so that the perceived as offensive by outsiders under circumstances where manners count to normal handling of the colleagues and superiors with each other. This is particularly so if the reason is the loud exchange of words in an objective criticism of the service rendered. Whenever because of the volume of used machinery and the merits of fair criticism of the finished work performance of an employee of either the rough or loud tone of voice will be considered in the first whether the new tone in the specific context or "socially adequate" was. Only if either the terms used or the tone as such in a particular case were no longer acceptable, there is room for an examination of the "intent to cause damage" of the offender and thus for bullying acts and suffering.
II consequences for the employee prevails
After that decision right now for reasons of security workers. That court has held in its decision clear limits of pain and suffering claim. The reality of life following the trial court has called for a serious violation of individual rights to to reach a damages claim. Whether an injury is serious it produces depends on whether the meaning and scope of the intervention, cause and motive and the degree of fault on the socially excessive, BAG NZA 2007, page 1154, BGHZ 160, page 298 The trial court emphasized that it "depended workplace conflicts general" for the award of damages to a definition of "bullying" and. Only when there is a long-term and systematic injury, you may be conscious and purposeful verbal hostility, a corresponding right to financial compensation exist, BAG NZA, page 781, BAG NZA 2007, page 11545.
The practical consequence of this decision is hard to miss. Workers who feel bullied because of improper or inappropriate tone along with vociferous criticism reproving only prospect of financial compensation if the statements made in this particular case have left the normal social framework.
Dr. jur. Frank Sievert participate
lawyer
Hamburg, 17.08.2009
www.kuendigungsschutz-aktuell.de
Wednesday, August 19, 2009
100 Pipers Scotch For Sale
Ulla Schmidt and the Hartz IV recipients
"... I am the opinion that if we our ALG II - recipients look closely at your fingers, then a federal minister may exempt their actions and should not necessarily undergo also a moral test. So that they would return the policy 'loss of credibility at least to some extent ... "
If the state, the Hartz IV - ausgespioniert recipients with former Stasi employees, IM's and Stasi methods (see Magdeburg, Offenbach district ..) then he should treat with the same methods of tax evasion. If it really just about the loss and go to overpaid money, so money that is missing from the state in one way or another, we ought to be go there, find out the most is to get.
The actions against Hartz IV recipients should be in their total costs - are represented, including the public expense by 85% lost processes carried HARTZ IV recipients hard.
There are from 90,000 procedures. Assuming that 50% lose these processes of state and added that the lost processes in the past and to the staff costs of the total of the Hartz IV process involved public servants who
I would like to expect the results of the audit process to see .
Hartz IV total costs out of control costs
Hartz IV with total control 25.6 billion (without Processes)
balance
Realistic tax BRD Total 100 000 000 000
staff and personnel to recover this money which actually
excessive funds?
it comes to money or to make the platform of people? 
"... I am the opinion that if we our ALG II - recipients look closely at your fingers, then a federal minister may exempt their actions and should not necessarily undergo also a moral test. So that they would return the policy 'loss of credibility at least to some extent ... "
If the state, the Hartz IV - ausgespioniert recipients with former Stasi employees, IM's and Stasi methods (see Magdeburg, Offenbach district ..) then he should treat with the same methods of tax evasion. If it really just about the loss and go to overpaid money, so money that is missing from the state in one way or another, we ought to be go there, find out the most is to get.
The actions against Hartz IV recipients should be in their total costs - are represented, including the public expense by 85% lost processes carried HARTZ IV recipients hard.
There are from 90,000 procedures. Assuming that 50% lose these processes of state and added that the lost processes in the past and to the staff costs of the total of the Hartz IV process involved public servants who
I would like to expect the results of the audit process to see .
Hartz IV total costs out of control costs
Hartz IV with total control 25.6 billion (without Processes)
balance
Realistic tax BRD Total 100 000 000 000
staff and personnel to recover this money which actually
excessive funds?
it comes to money or to make the platform of people?
Saturday, August 15, 2009
Buy A Bamboo Wedding Arch
thresh journalists to the SPD: QED!
thresh Why so many journalists particularly hard one for the SPD? Jürgen Busche / TIME 13/08/2009
There is in this campaign, an anti-democratic social affect. It is reflected most strikingly in the mocking pity, which opposes the proposed SPD chancellor candidate, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, mainly from formerly friendly page. With a person has little to do. More follows the disparaging criticism here on the urgent need to make rejection of concrete. Because of the massive anti-Socialists mood does not correspond to any sort of sympathy for the Union parties. The FDP has never been so much patronage party this year as the global economic crisis. And the surveys held present popularity of Chancellor Angela Merkel hovers above it all, as there was no campaigning. Each participant
talkative rounds in German pubs can confirm these findings. There are even fewer journalists than politicians. They certainly are not in such cases like abused media alone, the SPD be damaged by hail in the summer, although the conformism especially the journalists on this occasion reveal it makes the Social hard to fight back against injustice in a brief time. The conformity is not new. He met Helmut Kohl after his election defeat in 1976, he accompanied Gerhard Schroeder in his campaign against the 'professor from Heidelberg ", that of the CDU as finance minister Paul Kirchhof provided. Again, the enthusiasm was yelling at market places to start. If you say today that the union leaders had not sufficiently defended her husband, one must add that the so-called published opinion, a bad-attacked not counsel, who had previously been at least the Federal Constitutional Court. Rudolf Augstein's word, when an avalanche crashing down on a man, he was not happy to be part of the avalanche, but likes to quote, but almost never followed. As it currently much of the success story of the Federal Republic, tells a sad chapter should be devoted to the conformity in the German press. However, we examine the reasons for the anti-SPD-emotion, there are certainly several of them, but also including the special, that there is a closer relationship between the SPD and many journalists as between the Union and the luminaries of this article. It has a long tradition, and for much of that time are neither socialists nor journalists need to be ashamed of. Of the three Social Democratic chancellors was the first Willy Brandt, Journalist at the beginning of his professional career, and second, Helmut Schmidt, was on the political career - both with success.
There are journalists in the German-Semitism "a disposition to demonstrate progressive," even the philosopher Hermann Lübbe said that was the time of the student movement as a Social Democrat Secretary of State in Dusseldorf. He took possession of the turn of 1968. The journalists, who were then at the beginning of their careers going, soon to retire. And many of the journalists who today about the huge range of possibilities grout of their profession, have been shaped by them, which - in the known superiority of the 68 - not be addressed without suffering be. And now that the obvious generation project of the "march through the institutions" to a close, disappointed love determines the settlement with the SPD.
Now it is no longer about the stronghold of the Union Federal Republic of - "of the CDU state," it said 1968 - thanks to Brandt, Schmidt and Schroeder, was thanks to the SPD-ministers in the grand coalition has become more socially democratic.
What matters now is that the once coined by Herbert Wehner, Willy Brandt and Fritz Erler SPD thanks to Schröder, Steinmeier Clement and the CDU has become increasingly similar - a CDU, which for decades demonized by left-liberal journalists had been. become as a dream of red-green reality was, it was a Social Democratic chancellor, the German soldiers to wage war across the border, sent it was his super-minister, who went with the Hartz IV reforms the workers to the meager assets, it was the current chancellor candidate who refused to receive a German citizen in Germany, who was sitting innocently in Guantanamo. All this and more isolated in the eleven years of social democratic participation in government in Berlin declared by most journalists, if not defended with conviction. But in sum, it is eventually became too much.
What the press - to use the old word to use again - Demonstrates currently gloating, is belated independence. She takes revenge on the SPD not only disappointed love. She takes revenge, bitter yet, for several of my own failure. What's next, you can see after the election. 
thresh Why so many journalists particularly hard one for the SPD? Jürgen Busche / TIME 13/08/2009
There is in this campaign, an anti-democratic social affect. It is reflected most strikingly in the mocking pity, which opposes the proposed SPD chancellor candidate, Frank-Walter Steinmeier, mainly from formerly friendly page. With a person has little to do. More follows the disparaging criticism here on the urgent need to make rejection of concrete. Because of the massive anti-Socialists mood does not correspond to any sort of sympathy for the Union parties. The FDP has never been so much patronage party this year as the global economic crisis. And the surveys held present popularity of Chancellor Angela Merkel hovers above it all, as there was no campaigning. Each participant
talkative rounds in German pubs can confirm these findings. There are even fewer journalists than politicians. They certainly are not in such cases like abused media alone, the SPD be damaged by hail in the summer, although the conformism especially the journalists on this occasion reveal it makes the Social hard to fight back against injustice in a brief time. The conformity is not new. He met Helmut Kohl after his election defeat in 1976, he accompanied Gerhard Schroeder in his campaign against the 'professor from Heidelberg ", that of the CDU as finance minister Paul Kirchhof provided. Again, the enthusiasm was yelling at market places to start. If you say today that the union leaders had not sufficiently defended her husband, one must add that the so-called published opinion, a bad-attacked not counsel, who had previously been at least the Federal Constitutional Court. Rudolf Augstein's word, when an avalanche crashing down on a man, he was not happy to be part of the avalanche, but likes to quote, but almost never followed. As it currently much of the success story of the Federal Republic, tells a sad chapter should be devoted to the conformity in the German press. However, we examine the reasons for the anti-SPD-emotion, there are certainly several of them, but also including the special, that there is a closer relationship between the SPD and many journalists as between the Union and the luminaries of this article. It has a long tradition, and for much of that time are neither socialists nor journalists need to be ashamed of. Of the three Social Democratic chancellors was the first Willy Brandt, Journalist at the beginning of his professional career, and second, Helmut Schmidt, was on the political career - both with success.
There are journalists in the German-Semitism "a disposition to demonstrate progressive," even the philosopher Hermann Lübbe said that was the time of the student movement as a Social Democrat Secretary of State in Dusseldorf. He took possession of the turn of 1968. The journalists, who were then at the beginning of their careers going, soon to retire. And many of the journalists who today about the huge range of possibilities grout of their profession, have been shaped by them, which - in the known superiority of the 68 - not be addressed without suffering be. And now that the obvious generation project of the "march through the institutions" to a close, disappointed love determines the settlement with the SPD.
Now it is no longer about the stronghold of the Union Federal Republic of - "of the CDU state," it said 1968 - thanks to Brandt, Schmidt and Schroeder, was thanks to the SPD-ministers in the grand coalition has become more socially democratic.
What matters now is that the once coined by Herbert Wehner, Willy Brandt and Fritz Erler SPD thanks to Schröder, Steinmeier Clement and the CDU has become increasingly similar - a CDU, which for decades demonized by left-liberal journalists had been. become as a dream of red-green reality was, it was a Social Democratic chancellor, the German soldiers to wage war across the border, sent it was his super-minister, who went with the Hartz IV reforms the workers to the meager assets, it was the current chancellor candidate who refused to receive a German citizen in Germany, who was sitting innocently in Guantanamo. All this and more isolated in the eleven years of social democratic participation in government in Berlin declared by most journalists, if not defended with conviction. But in sum, it is eventually became too much.
What the press - to use the old word to use again - Demonstrates currently gloating, is belated independence. She takes revenge on the SPD not only disappointed love. She takes revenge, bitter yet, for several of my own failure. What's next, you can see after the election.
Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Harmful Effects Of Hot Cheetos
private flight from Merkel to Sylt
is repeatedly mentioned in connection with the affairs of a private flight envy debate. This makes the topic but
nicht.Es issue here is about the question of the separation of private and business. A helicopter service is provided to the Chancellor for their office and available on its borrowed time and if a chancellor holds on Sylt coffee wreath there and site visits is responsible may take place before a car and are not an official car with driver + helicopter / pilot from Berlin. Everything else is disproportionate.
Monday, August 10, 2009
Cookie Decorating Valentine
border checkpoint Drewitz 1995
look at the control point in the direction of Berlin
left the access road for trucks
right to access for cars
photo Gerhard Bäselt
Every year since the 90 years I have to on Aug 13 at an exciting story . remember
We had the 1995 Order, the Ministry of Finance in Potsdam study on energy savings out. The Ministry of Finance lives since the fall of the wall in the premises of the border troops of the former border checkpoint Drewitz. For on-site inspection, I was the "chief concierge" assigned. We went through each area of 30,000 square meters. "How long have you to do that here already," I ask. "Oh, for the last thirty years," I learn from him. So he was before the fall in the same function. That is almost all caretakers in the Brandenburg case, and therefore were and are the conversations with them, by such great insight.
At that time 13.8. in the 90s, the Prime Ministers' Conference held at the Casino in the former Stolpe Drewitz system. "Since we can never enter," I know. So we go back around the impressive building. Suddenly my companion is standing in front of a door. "This was since the fall, no one inside, I also do not want you in there?" As he looked it -. With a look of fear and curiosity, I had in there "I was sure I would not have to ask," he says a little smile back on.
succeed with extreme force him to open the door and in seconds we are in the night of 9 November 1989 back. The screening room of the border troops has left still moments: the Cabinet-plus cigarette ashes lie in the ashtray, two tunics hang chaotic on two chairs, a Cap is flung in the corner, naked girls posing on posters on the walls, the Calendar has stopped on 9/11/1989 and one of the two giant Czech film projectors is as just on half coil off with pickled 16mm film.
Meopta film projector built in 1951 (photo Meopta)
through a dusty large window we see Stolpe just give a speech, and behind him the white film wall. "No, no, you do not" me begs the janitor, the even an inkling of what happened the same. I press the power button and with a deafening noise, this unit is in motion. On the wall in the conference hall appearance, on which a republic escape exits in the vicinity of the Spandau forest by jeep and machine gun, the shots, the corresponding teacher comment of a man's voice can be heard gestures .. Stolpe, screams, no one knows what's going on here, suddenly, I turn off the thing. This was so professional, the prevention of DDR-flight geübt.Gespenstisch!
left hanging on the wall for 5 rolls of film with the label: Donation 12.Dez.1989 Strausberg. And there they wait well today.
"Why did you not put in order," an unknown voice behind me. Without having seen it, we were behind by 5 men in retirement the now open door diffused. They had obviously worked here earlier and developed a spontaneous idea, how could the "process" here intelligent ......
Discarded rusting children Panzer Treptow Park 2000
What concerns me after such experiences again and again and again and again busy that I had sworn by endless harassment at this very Drewitz point .. If you at some point these guys in this life or beyond will meet privately, then .... And then I go for days almost freundschftlich with one of them, laughing, joking and just get it any more. German unity - so just isses!
ps: most ärgerlich1. I was so moved by the situation that I totally forgot
to photograph .....
most annoying 2: Exactly one year ago - 08.13.2008 - began talks
Andrea Ypsilanti <> THE LEFT. Despite my former and current enthusiasm for
Andrea Ypsilanti, I found this date as a prelude to talks
shameful and forgotten history - it should prove to
than symbolic, unfortunately!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)